S Corporation vs. LLC: Which Is Right for Your Manufacturing Company?
For decades, owners of small to midsize manufacturing companies have opted for the S corporation form of ownership, rather than being subject to the double taxation of C corporations. However, in recent years, the limited liability company (LLC) has become another popular alternative. Let’s compare these two business structures.
S Corporations
Unlike a C corporation, items of income and expenses are passed through to S corporation owners and reported on their individual income tax returns, similar to partners in a partnership. To qualify for S corporation status, the corporation must meet these requirements:
- Be a U.S. corporation,
- Have only eligible shareholders (including individuals and certain trusts and estates),
- Have no more than 100 shareholders, and
- Have only one class of stock.
An existing manufacturing company can switch to S corporation status by making an election by the 15th day of the third month of the tax year.
The pros of an S corporation include:
Limited liability. This is critical to owners of manufacturing companies. Usually, S corporation shareholders can’t be held personally liable for debts of the company. Thus, creditors can’t come after your personal assets (except in limited instances).
No double taxation. A C corporation is subject to tax twice — once on business income at the corporate level and again on the personal level when shareholders receive dividends. With an S corporation, income is taxable only at the personal level. In fact, an S corporation itself generally is exempt from tax.
Tax-saving opportunities for owner-employees. An S corporation owner-employee can opt how much to receive as salary vs. income distributions from the corporation. Finding the right mix can lower your overall tax bill. Unlike salary, income distributions aren’t subject to payroll taxes. But the owner must be paid a reasonable salary for services rendered. Otherwise, the IRS could reclassify distributions as salary, subject to payroll taxes, and also assess interest and penalties.
Ease of ownership transfer. It’s generally easier to transfer S corporation shares than ownership in other business entities. It’s possible to do so without dire tax consequences even if the business is terminated. An S corporation can survive the departure of its sole owner.
The cons of an S corporation include:
Ownership restrictions. As stated above, the requirements under federal law are rigid. For example, depending on the situation, the limit on the number of shareholders or restriction to one class of stock may hamper operations. However, certain family members can be counted as a single shareholder.
Profit and loss allocation. An S corporation is required to allocate profits and losses among the owners based on the percentage of ownership or number of shares owned.
Corporate formalities. S corporations are bound by the strict laws affecting corporations imposed by the state. This means meeting certain registration and regulatory obligations. Be aware that an S corporation must register to do business in other states outside of its home jurisdiction.
LLCs
The popularity of LLCs has been growing dramatically. Briefly stated, an LLC combines the liability protection of C corporations with the tax benefits of S corporations and partnerships, but without some of the restrictions of S corporations. LLCs are authorized under state laws that vary around the country. (Many states don’t restrict ownership.) LLC owners generally are referred to as “members.”
The pros of an LLC include:
Limited liability. As the name implies, the limited liability protection afforded to LLCs is a significant attraction to LLC members. Creditors generally can’t touch their personal assets. This benefit can’t be overemphasized. In fact, protection may be even greater for LLCs than S corporations under prevailing state laws.
No double taxation. LLCs are generally taxed as partnerships (unless they elect otherwise), thereby avoiding double taxation. You may not even have to file a tax return for the LLC. However, a return is required if the LLC has more than one member.
Profit and loss allocation. An LLC member may be entitled to receive a disproportionate share of income and expenses. Unlike an S corporation, the allocation doesn’t have to be based strictly on ownership percentages.
Ownership flexibility. There’s no limit on the number of members an LLC can have. Also, ownership is available to corporate and foreign entities.
The cons of an LLC include:
Possible tax disadvantages for owner-employees. Generally, all business income that flows through to LLC owner-employees is subject to self-employment tax — even if it isn’t distributed to you. But such income may not be subject to self-employment tax if you’re the LLC member equivalent of a limited partner.
More difficult ownership transfer. It’s often more difficult to transfer ownership of an LLC than it is to transfer S corporation ownership. Unlike corporations, there are no shares of stock. Typically, all members must approve new members or changes in the ownership percentages of existing members. Also, a single-member LLC will automatically be terminated if the member exits the organization.
S Corporation vs. LLC
While both forms of ownership have their pros and cons, LLCs are steadily on the rise. Nevertheless, you may find that an S corporation is preferable for your manufacturing company. Conduct a thorough analysis with assistance from our tax advisors to determine which form of ownership is right for your manufacturing company.
© 2022
Related Insights
Featured Post
Featured Client Testimonials
BW is a true partner to us. Their knowledge, expertise, and service are a valuable resource to us and play an important role in our success!
John Allen - Vice President of Finance, Kaufman Container
Featured Client Testimonials
I appreciate the exceptional tax advice we received over the years. The (BW team) has a good grasp of our business needs. Thank you for your excellent service.
John Griffiths - Owner, Rae Ann, Inc.
Featured Client Testimonials
Barnes Wendling has been our company accountants for over seven years. Their knowledge has been instrumental in helping us grow strategically during this time. And although we’ve seen many changes in our economy that we cannot control, we’ve always been able to trust the Barnes team to be by our side. The Barnes team feels like family. We can’t thank them enough for their support!
Christine Kloss - Controller, AT&F
Featured Client Testimonials
Barnes Wendling has been our company accountants for over 15 years. During this time, the business has grown exceptionally, and Barnes has kept pace, providing accurate, quality advice. Our finances are more efficient than ever, and the expense of hiring Barnes has been a definite positive add to our bottom line. I give my highest recommendation to their firm.
David Miller, MD - President, Retina Associates of Cleveland
Featured Client Testimonials
Barnes Wendling has provided us guidance and recommendations that have strategically helped strengthen our business and position ourselves for growth. We needed to hire a new VP of Finance and Controller this past year, and they were instrumental in helping us find the best candidates for our company.
Sara Blankenship - President, Kaufman Container
Featured Client Testimonials
We value the trust, accuracy of information, and reliability of Barnes Wendling and Mike Essenmacher personally. Mike has been instrumental as a trusted advisor on accounting, tax, and personnel issues. His advice is always accurate, and he is very reliable. His associates are also very talented.
Dominic Ozanne - President and CEO, Ozanne Construction Company
Featured Client Testimonials
We value Barnes Wendling’s expertise with all things accounting so we can operate our business using our strengths and allowing them to be our experts. They have also brought me a few business sale opportunities to allow me to grow my assets.
John Gaydosh - President and Metallurgical Engineer, Ohio Metallurgical Service
Featured Client Testimonials
Barnes Wendling (especially Lena) did a great job with our financials. Everything. It is extremely refreshing and comforting to know that all of our numbers are not only correct, but they are in the right place(s). Your diligence and reporting truly does make me (personally) feel better.
Thomas Adomaitis - Controller, Bialosky Cleveland
Featured Client Testimonials
I can wholeheartedly tell you that I have yet to work with an audit or tax team that have been more helpful, easy to work with, and committed than the team at Barnes Wendling- I have been through three different firms in the last few years.
Michelle Saylor, Former Controller, Aero Mag
Featured Client Testimonials
Floyd Trouten at Barnes Wendling CPAs is an “expert’s expert” when it comes to M & A accounting. Not only does he understand the evolving details of the Tax Code but he also sees the fine points of their application for owners, managers, investors, and financiers.
Mark A. Filippell, Western Reserve Partners
Featured Client Testimonials
The service is amazing at Barnes Wendling CPAs. The benefit is worth more than the cost. Sometimes it’s true that you get what you pay for.
Mark Boucher - Former Owner, Castle Heating & Air